Hamas Operations in South Africa

Hamas Operations in South Africa

Historical Foundations and Contemporary Networks

On September 27, 2025, pro-Hamas organizations converged in Cape Town, South Africa, for a march and rally that highlighted the deep-rooted connections between the Palestinian militant group and South African support networks. The event, which featured inflammatory rhetoric including chants of “Viva Hamas” and declarations that participants were “all Hamas,” represents the latest manifestation of relationships that have been cultivating for decades since Hamas’s founding in 1987.


Historical Context: Hamas’s Early Expansion to South Africa

Hamas, formally established in December 1987 during the First Intifada by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin as the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, began extending its influence internationally almost immediately after its founding. South Africa became a key target for Hamas outreach due to several converging factors that created fertile ground for the organization’s operations. The timing of Hamas’s formation coincided with South Africa’s own liberation struggle against apartheid, creating natural ideological affinities between Palestinian and South African resistance movements. The African National Congress (ANC) and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) had already established solidarity ties dating back to the 1950s and 1960s, with both movements viewing themselves as engaged in anti-colonial struggles against oppressive regimes.

By the late 1980s and early 1990s, as Hamas was establishing itself in the Palestinian territories, South African Islamic organizations were simultaneously undergoing political radicalization. Groups like Qibla, founded in Cape Town in 1980 and inspired by Iran’s Islamic Revolution, had already demonstrated that South African Muslim communities could be mobilized around international Islamic causes. The Muslim Youth Movement, which emerged in the early 1980s, specifically formed the Palestine Islamic Solidarity Committee (Paliscom) to focus on Palestinian issues. This political infrastructure provided Hamas with ready-made networks and sympathetic audiences when it began expanding its operations beyond the Palestinian territories in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Organizational Infrastructure: The Al-Quds Foundation Network

Central to Hamas’s South African operations has been the establishment of charitable and religious organizations that serve as conduits for fundraising and ideological support. The Al-Quds Foundation of South Africa (AQFSA), established in the early 2000s as a branch of the Lebanon-based Al-Quds International Foundation, became the primary vehicle for Hamas activities in the country. The international Al-Quds Foundation was established in Beirut in 2001 by Hamas members specifically to raise funds for the organization through charitable activities. The U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned the international foundation in 2012, determining it was controlled by Hamas and featured several senior Hamas leaders on its board. However, the South African branch has remained unsanctioned, allowing it to operate freely within the country’s banking system.

Leadership of these organizations has been dominated by figures with direct Hamas connections. Ebrahim Gabriels, who has served as president of both the Al-Quds Foundation South Africa and the Muslim Judicial Council, has maintained extensive personal relationships with Hamas leadership for over two decades. He has met with Hamas officials in Damascus in 2009, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Gaza in 2011, and politburo members in South Africa in 2017. A 2021 Arabic-language biography of Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk specifically identified Gabriels as Abu Marzouk’s “gateway to South Africa’s Muslim community”.

Institutional Partnerships: The ANC Connection

The relationship between Hamas and South Africa’s ruling African National Congress extends back to the organization’s early years. Shortly after Hamas won Palestinian parliamentary elections in 2006, ANC-led South Africa became one of the few countries to forge ties with the Hamas-led Palestinian government. This formal recognition provided Hamas with crucial diplomatic legitimacy during a period of international isolation. The partnership deepened significantly in 2015 when ANC leaders welcomed senior Hamas officials Khaled Mashaal and Mousa Abu Marzouk for the signing of a letter of intent aimed at strengthening ties between the organizations. The visit included ANC-organized conferences where Mashaal promised continued Hamas attacks against Israel, statements that went unchallenged by South African officials. In 2018, the ANC and Hamas signed a memorandum of understanding to advance the international Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel. This agreement included commitments by the ANC to work within South Africa’s parliament to downgrade diplomatic relations with Israel, a promise that was fulfilled when South Africa shuttered its embassy in Tel Aviv in 2023.

Financial Networks and Terror Financing

Hamas’s South African operations have been facilitated by a complex web of financial networks that exploit the country’s banking system. The organization has operated through multiple front organizations, including the Al-Aqsa Foundation South Africa, which was listed as a member of the Union of Good, an umbrella charity group sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury Department in 2008 for funding Hamas. Gabriels served as a board member of the Union of Good in the early 2000s, demonstrating the interconnected nature of international Hamas financing networks. Even after sanctions were imposed on related organizations, South African entities continued operating by maintaining separate legal structures while preserving operational connections to sanctioned groups.

The extent of these financial operations has drawn scrutiny from international banking compliance systems. The Al-Quds Foundation South Africa was designated as a “terror-related entity” on World-Check, a database used globally by financial institutions to identify heightened risk agents. Despite this designation, South African banks have continued providing services to Hamas-linked organizations, suggesting gaps in the country’s counterterror financing enforcement.

Contemporary Operations and Government Support

The September 27, 2025 rally demonstrated the extent to which Hamas operations in South Africa have become normalized and even officially supported. The event was led by organizations with documented Hamas ties, while ANC officials participated directly in activities featuring explicit support for terrorism. ANC First Deputy Secretary-General Nomvula Mokonyane addressed the gathering, calling for boycotts of Israel and defiantly challenging potential U.S. sanctions against ANC officials. Her presence represented official party endorsement of an event featuring Hamas propaganda and terrorist glorification. The rally organizers included figures who have maintained decades-long relationships with Hamas leadership. Riad Fataar, president of the Muslim Judicial Council, led chants of “Death to the IDF” and has previously declared “We are all Hamas”. These statements go beyond symbolic support to constitute active promotion of terrorist ideology within South African civil society.

Regional and International Implications

Hamas’s entrenchment in South Africa represents more than a bilateral relationship between a terrorist organization and sympathetic local groups. The network provides Hamas with a platform for operations across southern and eastern Africa, with Hamas representative Emad Saber serving as the organization’s director for the entire region. South Africa’s position as a regional economic hub and its membership in international organizations like the BRICS group amplify the significance of Hamas operations within its borders. The organization has leveraged South African diplomatic initiatives, including the country’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, to advance its political objectives on global stages.

The persistence and expansion of Hamas networks in South Africa, despite international sanctions and counterterrorism efforts elsewhere, demonstrates how sympathetic government policies can provide safe havens for terrorist organizations. The September 2025 rally, featuring open Hamas support with official ANC participation, suggests these relationships are strengthening rather than diminishing over time.

The nearly four-decade presence of Hamas in South Africa, from the organization’s founding in 1987 through contemporary public rallies, illustrates how terrorist organizations can establish durable international networks when they find ideological alignment with local political movements and institutional protection from sympathetic governments.

  • Centres on the utility, significance, and potential impact of research and analysis
  • Encompasses a range of research attributes, including significance, utility, timeliness, actionability, practicality, applicability, feasibility, innovation, adaptability, and impact
  • Mandates that research teams clearly define the scope and objectives of their work to ensure its timeliness, feasibility, and utility
  • May necessitate adjustments to research plans -such as research questions, data sources, or methodologies- in response to new insights or evolving circumstances

    In brief, we aim to shape and advance effective, timely solutions to critical Policy challenges
  • Emphasises the pursuit of robust, replicable scientific inquiry to uncover evidence-based insights that support informed decision-making,foster stakeholder consensus, and drive effective implementation
  • Is anchored by a well-defined purpose and carefully crafted research questions.Rigorous research produces findings derived from sound, contextually appropriate methodologies, which may include established techniques, innovative approaches, or experimental designs. Conclusions and recommendations are logically derived from these findings.
  • Encompasses a range of research attributes, including validity, reliability, credibility, systematicity, creativity, persuasiveness m, logical coherence, cutting-edge innovation, authority, robustness, replicability, defensibility, and adaptability
  • Mandates that LVS researchers remain abreast of, and potentially contribute  to, advancements jn theoretical frameworks, methodologies, and data sources.

    In brief, we conduct impartial analyses rooted in a clear purpose, employing rigorous logic and the most suitable theories, methods, and data sources available
  • Emphasises the thorough, effective, and appropriate documentation and dissemination of the research process (including design, development, execution, and support) and its outcomes (findings and recommendations)
  • Encompasses key research attributes, such as accountability, comprehensive reporting, replicability, and data accessibility
  • Mandates that research teams clearly articulate and document their purpose, scope, funding sources, assumptions, methodologies, data, results, limitations, findings, and policy recommendations to the fullest extent practicable, addressing the needs of those who oversee, evaluate, utilise, replicate, or are impacted by the research.
  • May be enhanced through supplementary materials, including research land, protocols, tools, code, datasets, reports, presentations, infographics, translations and videos
  • Requires LVS documents and products to have a defined purpose, be accessible, easily discoverable, and tailored to meet the needs of their intended audiences

    In brief, we communicate our research processes, analyses, findings, and recommendations in a manner that is clear, accessible, and actionable
  • Centres in the ethical, impartial, independent, and objective execution of research
  • Enhances the validity, credibility, acceptance, and adoption of research outcomes
  • Is upheld by institutional principles, policies, procedures, and oversight mechanisms
  • Is rooted in a genuine understanding of the values and norms of pertinent stakeholders

    In brief, we undertake research with ethical integrity, mitigate conflicts of interest, and preserve independence and objectivity

Engaged Contributor

All Visionary Benefits +

  • Members-only White Papers
  • Regular Contributor in Communiqué
  • Private in-person conversation with one of our Experts
  • Guest Speaker in Podcasts / Webinars
  • Recognition as Engaged Contributor (website)

Contribution Level: $150 monthly/$1,250 annually

Important Contributor

All Strategist Benefits +

  • Members-only Position papers
  • Recognition as Important contributor in Annual Impact Report
  • Complimentary copies of new publications
  • Publication of one article in Communiqué (full page) 
Contribution Level: $60 monthly/$500 annually

Engaged Supporter

All Sentinel Benefits +

  • Members-only Position papers (BRAVE, COMPASS, STRIDE)
  • Annual Impact Report
  • Access to members-only podcasts/webinars
  • One article in Communiqué (½ page)

Contribution Level: $30 monthly/$250 annually

  • Emphasises the integration and balanced consideration of diverse, significant perspectives throughout the research process to ensure objective and equitable representation
  • Fosters awareness of the comprehensive range of scientific and policy viewpoints on multifaceted issues
  • Guarantees that these diverse perspectives are fairly addressed throughout the research process, accurately represented, and evaluated based on evidence
  • Incorporates perspectives from individuals with varied backgrounds and expertise within research teams and through collaboration with diverse reviewers, partners and stakeholders
  • Strengthens research teams’ capacity to comprehend the policy context and enhance the applicability of findings and conclusions

    In brief, we systematically integrate all relevant perspectives across the research process
  • Enhances comprehension of the problem and it’s context, while strengthening research design
  • Guides the evaluation of potential solutions and facilitates effective implementation
  • Entails incorporating diverse, relevant perspectives to promote rigorous, mitigate unintended bias in research design, execution, and dissemination, and ensure findings are pertinent and clear to key stakeholders
  • Arrives to make LVS research accessible, where feasible, to a wide array of stakeholders beyond sponsors, decision-makers, or implementers
  • Occurs across the research life cycle through formal and informal methods, including discussions, interviews, focus groups, surveys, advisory panels, presentations, and community engagements

    In brief, we actively collaborate with stakeholders vested in the conduct, interpretation, and utilisation of our research.

Entry Level

Recognition as Supporter
  • Monthly Newsletter Communiqué
  • Briefs (BRAVE, COMPASS, STRIDE)
  • Beyond Boundaries Podcast
  • Digital Membership
  • Merchandising (in process)
Contribution Level: $7 monthly/$60 annually

We offer a 4-tier program with highly exclusive Benefits. Read more about this strategic partnership.

You are invited to contribute at your discretion, and we deeply appreciate your support. Together, we can make a meaningful impact. To join us or learn more, please contact us at [email protected]

The Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation: A Legacy Reborn

June 11, 2025 – 249 years ago, on this very date, history pivoted on the axis of human possibility.

June 11, 1776. The Continental Congress, meeting in the hallowed chambers of Independence Hall, appointed five extraordinary visionaries to a committee that would forever alter the trajectory of human civilization. Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert R. Livingston—men of profound intellect and unwavering conviction—were entrusted with the sacred task of drafting the Declaration of Independence. In that momentous decision, they established not merely a political document, but a philosophical foundation upon which the principles of liberty, self-governance, and human dignity would rest for generations yet unborn.

Today, We Stand at Another Threshold

On June 11, 2025—exactly 249 years later—the Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation emerges to carry forward the luminous torch of those founding principles into the complexities of our modern age. Just as Jefferson and his fellow committee members understood that true independence required both visionary thinking and strategic action, the Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation recognizes that preserving and advancing liberty in the 21st century demands sophisticated analysis, bold leadership, and unwavering commitment to the fundamental values that define human flourishing.

A Foundation Built on Timeless Principles

The parallels between then and now are profound:

  • Then, Five visionary leaders gathered to articulate the philosophical foundations of a new nation. Now, A new foundation emerges to advance strategic thinking on liberty’s most pressing challenges
  • Then, The Committee of Five understood that ideas must be coupled with practical wisdom. Now, The Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation bridges timeless principles with contemporary strategic insight
  • Then, They recognized that liberty requires constant vigilance and thoughtful stewardship. Now, We commit to that same vigilance in an increasingly complex world

In the shadow of Ethiopia’s Omo Valley, where the Mursi people etch resilience into their skin through lip plates and the Hamar tribe’s bull-jumping rites forge indomitable courage, a new chapter in the global fight for liberty begins. The Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation (LVS Foundation) launches today as a vanguard of 21st-century research, merging scholarly rigor with actionable strategy through its revolutionary Cohesive Research Ecosystem (CORE). Founded by Dr. Fundji Benedict—a scholar whose lineage intertwines Afrikaner grit, Ethiopian sovereignty, and Jewish perseverance—this institution embodies a legacy of defiance inherited from history’s most audacious truth-seekers, from Zora Neale Hurston to the warrior women of Ethiopia. This duality—scholarship as sword and shield—mirrors Dr. Benedict’s own journey. For 10+ years, she navigated bureaucratic inertia and geopolitical minefields, her resolve hardened by the Ethiopian women warriors who once defied Italian fascism.

 

 

I. The Hurston Imperative: Truth as a Weapon

Zora Neale Hurston, the Harlem Renaissance icon who “broke through racial barriers” and declared, “Truth is a letter from courage,” is the Foundation’s spiritual lodestar. Like Hurston, who documented Black life under Jim Crow with unflinching authenticity, the LVS Foundation wields research as both shield and scalpel. BRAVE, its human rights arm, intervenes in crises with the precision Hurston brought to folklore studies, transforming marginalized voices into policy. When Somali warlords displace the Gabra people or Ethiopian officials seize tribal lands, BRAVE acts with the urgency of Hurston’s anthropological missions, ensuring that “truth-telling becomes liberation”.

Dr. Benedict’s decade-long journey mirrors Hurston’s defiance. “My ancestors did not bow. I will not bow,” she asserts, her cadence echoing the Omo Valley’s ceremonial chants. This ethos permeates the Foundation’s CORE model, where BRAVE, COMPASS, and STRIDE operate in symphonic unity. “CORE is our answer to siloed thinking,” Dr. Benedict explains. “Through this cohesive ecosystem, BRAVE, COMPASS, and STRIDE work in concert—breaking down

barriers between academic research, fieldwork, and strategic action. This enables us to develop innovative solutions and stride toward lasting change”.

 

II. Necropolitics and the Battle for Human Dignity

The Foundation’s research agenda confronts necropolitics—a term coined by Achille Mbembe to describe regimes that decide “who may live and who must die”. In Somalia, where Al-Shabaab turns villages into killing fields, and South Africa, where post-apartheid politics increasingly marginalize minorities, the LVS Foundation exposes systemic dehumanization. STRIDE, now correctly positioned as the bulwark against terrorism and antisemitism, dismantles networks fueled by Qatari financing and ideological venom. COMPASS, the geopolitical hub, maps Qatar’s $6 billion influence campaigns, revealing how Doha’s alliances with Islamist groups destabilize democracies from Sahel to Paris, France.

“Qatar hides behind diplomatic immunity while funding mass murder,” Dr. Benedict states, citing Israeli intelligence linking Qatari funds to Hamas’s October 7 massacre. Meanwhile, BRAVE echoes fieldwork in Ethiopia’s Babille Elephant Sanctuary—where Dr. Benedict has studied bee barriers to resolve human-wildlife conflict—and epitomizes the Foundation’s ethos: “We turned conflict into cooperation, just as our ancestors turned adversity into art”.

 

III. The Ethiopian Woman Warrior: A Blueprint for Ferocity

The Foundation’s DNA is steeped in the legacy of Ethiopian women who weaponized intellect and audacity. Woizero Shewareged Gedle, who orchestrated prison breaks and ammunition heist during Italy’s occupation, finds her echo in STRIDE’s Intelligence operations. She struck an Italian officer mid-interrogation and declared, “You may imprison me, but you will not insult me”. Her defiance lives in STRIDE’s intelligence operations and BRAVE’s land-rights advocacy for all minorities like the Hamar, who endure ritual whipping to cement bonds of loyalty – a fight as visceral as it is cerebral -, but also the tribes or the Afrikaners in South Africa who face expropriation of their property without compensation. Dr. Benedict’s leadership rejects the false binary between academia and activism: “Research is not abstraction—it is alchemy. We transmute data into justice”.

 

IV. Conclusion: Lighting the Torch for Generations

The Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation stands as more than an institution—it is a living testament to the unyielding spirit of those who refuse to let darkness prevail. In a world where necropolitics reduces human lives to chess pieces and terrorism metastasizes in the shadows, the Foundation’s CORE research ecosystem illuminates a different path: one where rigorous scholarship becomes the catalyst for liberation. Every report published, every policy advocated, and every community defended is a reaffirmation of democracy’s most sacred tenet—that every life holds irreducible value.

Dr. Benedict’s vision transcends academic abstraction: BRAVE’s defense of pastoralist communities, COMPASS’s geopolitical cartography, and STRIDE’s dismantling of hate networks are not isolated acts but threads in a tapestry woven with the same audacity that Zora Neale Hurston brought to anthropology and Woizero Shewareged Gedle to resistance. The Foundation’s decade-long gestation mirrors the patience of Ethiopian honey hunters who wait years for the perfect hive—a reminder that enduring change demands both urgency and perseverance.

As a beacon for liberty, the LVS Foundation invites collaboration across borders and disciplines. To governments grappling with Qatar’s influence campaigns, to activists documenting human rights abuses, to citizens weary of complacency, the Foundation offers not just data but a blueprint for courage and defiance. Its research ecosystem—dynamic, interconnected, and unapologetically action-oriented—proves that knowledge, when wielded with integrity, can dismantle even the most entrenched systems of oppression.

 

The Torch Burns Bright

Over the past decade, Dr Benedict has combined rigorous academic work with on-the-ground engagement, building the knowledge and networks required to create this institution. Now, as the Foundation opens its doors, it stands as a testament to principled scholarship and action. In the legacy of Zora Neale Hurston’s fearless truth-telling, the LVS Foundation embraces the

power of knowledge guided by values. Crucially, the LVS Foundation maintains strict independence from any partisan or governmental funding. This non-partisanship is a cornerstone of its identity. “From day one, we refuse to be anyone’s instrument – no government, no party. Our independence guarantees that our voice remains unbiased and our research uncompromised,” Dr. Benedict emphasizes. “We owe that to the truth we seek. Hurston taught us about authenticity and courage; in that spirit, we will not pander or censor ourselves. We will ask the hard questions and pursue answers – wherever they lead – in service of liberty and human dignity.”

The revolution Dr. Benedict ignited is not hers alone. It belongs to every individual who dares to believe that democracy can be defended, that integrity can be restored, and that liberty is worth every sacrifice. Zora Neale Hurston once wrote, “There are years that ask questions and years that answer.” For the LVS Foundation, this is the year of answers and a responsibility to honor Hurston’s legacy by ensuring truth is not just spoken but lived. Those seeking to support Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation—through funding, fieldwork, or amplification—are welcomed at [email protected] or [email protected].