Syncopated* Scriptures: The Discordant Dance* Between Black Hebrew Israelites and Black Jews

Syncopated* Scriptures: The Discordant Dance* Between Black Hebrew Israelites and Black Jews

Black Hebrew Israelites gather and proselytize in metropolitan areas. This group is usually made up of black and brown Americans who claim to be the true Israelites and that modern day Jews are impostors. Their presence in America has increased over the past decade. They have stepped up their efforts and are growing – both online and on the streets.

These people can refer broadly to people of African descent who claim to be descended from the biblical Israelites and practice certain Jewish rituals. The movement traces its origins back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries when Frank Cherry and William Saunders Crowdy claimed divine visions asserting that African Americans are descendants of the ancient Israelites.

Image

Portrait de William S. Crowdy – vers 1907

Image

The movement emerged from a stream of late 19th-century black nationalism that claimed African-Americans were the true descendants of the ancient Hebrews. Some estimates put the number of adherents in the tens of thousands, and the various member groups vary in ideology and outlook. Those differences are manifest in their views on Jews, with some seeking mainstream Jewish community acceptance, while others see their identity as separate from Judaism.

The movement combines elements from Christianity and Judaism but often rejects traditional Jewish practice, creating their own interpretations of biblical texts. They incorporate influences from various sources, including Freemasonry and New Thought. Practices can vary significantly between groups, with some adhering to strict dietary laws akin to kosher observance, while others might promote a vegan lifestyle. They might also use Hebrew names and follow certain biblical commandments in unique ways.

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) classifies some Black Hebrew Israelites as a hate group, naming one branch in particular, the Israelite Church of God in Jesus Christ. A 2008 report from the center warned that extremism within the movement was on the rise. “Although most Hebrew Israelites are neither explicitly racist nor anti-Semitic and do not advocate violence, there is a rising extremist sector within the Hebrew Israelite movement whose adherents believe that Jews are devilish impostors and who openly condemn whites as evil personified, deserving only death or slavery,” the SPLC said. Extremist Hebrew Israelites can be found on street corners literally shouting their doctrine, which can include Holocaust denial, misogyny and anti-LGBTQ invective, at passersby; they are especially visible in major Northeastern cities like New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington, DC, as well as in Florida and some Southern states.

Image

Don’t Hebrew Israelites have a community in southern Israel?

One part of the wider Black Hebrew Israelite movement began arriving in Israel in the late 1960s, where they settled in the Negev Desert town of Dimona.

There were tensions at first between Israeli authorities and the group, but these have been mostly resolved. In recent years, members of the group have become citizens and integrated into Israel’s diverse music scene.

In January 1981, a delegation of African American leaders traveled to Israel to study the plight of the Original Hebrew Israelite Nation (now called the African Hebrew Israelites of Jerusalem). At the time, around 1,500 Hebrews were living in severely overcrowded apartments in three Negev towns and struggling to support themselves without the legal right to work. As chairman of the Black Americans to Support Israel Committee (BASIC) civil rights activist Bayard Rustin led the delegation. He and five others spent 11 days in the country and held meetings with Israeli government officials — including President Yitzhak Navon, Interior Minister Yosef Burg, Foreign Affairs Minister Yitzhak Shamir and Moshe Dayan — as well as U.S. Embassy officials, representatives of American Jewish organizations, Hebrews, and others.

Rustin, third from left, and other members of the BASIC delegation with Moshe Dayan. (Courtesy of the Estate of Bayard Rustin)

After the trip, the delegation produced a report with their findings and recommendations. In addition to absolving Israel of discriminating against the Hebrews based on race, the delegation acknowledged that the government faced a “very perplexing problem” — and one that demanded immediate action.

The delegation’s recommendations were to establish a clear policy regarding the Hebrews’ status in the country and, in the meantime, give them temporary work permits. The report also encouraged Israel to review its procedures at Ben Gurion airport, where immigration officials were reportedly discriminating against and even deporting African American travelers who were suspected of trying to join the community.

“This behavior on the part of Israeli officials risks being perceived as racist no matter what explanations are given,” the report said. “Beyond this, such behavior encourages anti-Israel propaganda, and creates conflict between American Jews and American Blacks.”

Black Hebrew Israelite beliefs

Image
  1. Hebrew Israelites believe those whose ancestors were put in bondage during the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade are the true descendants of Biblical Israel.
  2. Hebrew Israelites believe modern day Israelites and Europeanized Jews are impostors and not the real descendants of true Israel.
  3. Hebrew Israelites usually hold the King James Version of the Bible as authoritative. Some only hold to the Old Testament. Most hold to the Apocrypha as well.
  4. Hebrew Israelites believe the “time of the Gentiles” means “the time of the white Europeans”, whom they refer to as Edomites or Esau. They believe this time is almost over; America and its allies will soon be judged.
  5. Hebrew Israelites believe righteousness is achieved by law keeping. Strict Sabbath-keeping, dietary restrictions and a certain physical appearance is important (e.g., fringes and beards are good).
  6. Hebrew Israelites believe Jesus Christ (although they use a different name – “Yahshuah” – or some other name) was a black man.
  7. Many (not all) Hebrew Israelites believe “Edomites” (white people) can’t be saved. They are destined to be killed or slaves for Hebrew Israelites after the Messiah returns. Others believe “Gentiles” (non-Hebrew Israelites) can be grafted into the Kingdom if they keep the law and are under the authority of a Hebrew Israelite.
  8. Hebrew Israelites believe both heaven and hell are conditions – mere “states of mind”. Neither are viewed as metaphysical realities as they are in orthodox Christianity.
  9. Hebrew Israelites are usually part of the Sacred Name movement: they believe you must refer to God as “Yah” (or some other name). Their preference for God’s name usually depends on their individual sect (which they call “camp”).
  10. Hebrew Israelites believe by spreading their message they are gathering the scattered Israelites who do not yet know their true ancestry and heritage. In essence, their mission is to build a nation.

Five Common Practices/Characteristics

  1. On the street, Hebrew Israelites tend to be boisterous, belligerent and bold. They blurt, blare and bellow. If you engage a member on the street, be prepared for a noisy encounter. They often enjoy shouting obscenities at pedestrians and onlookers, especially those whom they deem to be morally repugnant (e.g., women wearing pants, black-and-white couples, etc.).
  2. Hebrew Israelites craft their own signage. Common images include politicians with devil horns, “white Jesus” portrayals, images of slavery (men with scarred backs, slave ship diagrams, etc.) and the all-important 12 Tribes of Israel genealogy chart. For example, the Tribe of Judah is said to be the ancestors of black Americans, Isaachar for Mexicans and Gad for Native Americans.
  3. Hebrew Israelites travel in groups. I’ve seen anywhere from three to a dozen congregate.
  4. Hebrew Israelites members love to carry tattered old Bibles. Their messages include heavy doses of Scripture. Usually, there is a primary speaker and then a Scripture reader. The speaker will shout a verse to the reader – “Give me that Deuteronomy 28!” – and then the reader yells it out – loudly.
  5. Most Hebrew Israelites will engage you – to a certain extent. If they view you as “having a demon” (a common accusation they make against opponents), they act dismissive and aggressive. If they see you as interested (but not too “talky”), they love the chance to lecture and even “cross-examine” you (“What does ADAM mean?” “What does Judah mean?”).

The relationship between Black Hebrew Israelites and Ethiopian Jews

The relationship between Black Hebrew Israelites and Ethiopian Jews, often referred to as Beta Israel, is complex and not uniform across all Black Hebrew Israelite groups. Not all Black Hebrew Israelites hold the same views regarding Ethiopian Jews, but there are significant points of divergence:

  • Identity and Heritage: Some Black Hebrew Israelite groups believe that they are the true descendants of ancient Israelites, often excluding or not recognizing the Jewish identity of other groups, including Ethiopian Jews. This stems from their belief that African Americans are the direct descendants of the biblical Israelites, while they may view modern Jews, including Ethiopian Jews, as imposters or not true to the original Israelite lineage.
  • Different Religious Practices and Beliefs: Black Hebrew Israelites often have distinct religious practices and beliefs that diverge from mainstream Judaism, including Ethiopian Judaism. They might not recognize Ethiopian Jews because their practices do not align with the interpretations and customs that Black Hebrew Israelites follow, which can include a mix of Christianity, Judaism, and other influences.
  • Political and Social Context: The recognition or non-recognition can also be influenced by political and social contexts. Some Black Hebrew Israelites have expressed anti-Semitic sentiments, which can extend to not recognizing any form of contemporary Judaism, including that practiced by Ethiopian Jews. However, it’s important to note that not all Black Hebrew Israelites are anti-Semitic, and some have worked to build bridges with various Jewish communities.
  • Historical and Organizational Differences: Ethiopian Jews trace their lineage back to ancient times, with traditions and rituals that have been practiced for centuries in Ethiopia. Black Hebrew Israelites, on the other hand, have a more recent origin, starting in the late 19th or early 20th century in the United States, with different founders and historical developments. This historical divergence can lead to a lack of recognition or acknowledgment between the two groups.

Conclusion

The movement has gained more public attention through high-profile incidents or endorsements by celebrities like Kyrie Irving and Kanye West, although these associations do not necessarily represent the views of all Black Hebrew Israelites. In summary, while some Black Hebrew Israelites might not recognize Black Jews (and Ethiopian Jews in particular) as part of their understanding of Israelite identity due to differences in religious practice, heritage claims, and sometimes ideological stances, the relationship is a complex with both Jewish communities and other African American religious movements, with some Black Hebrew Israelites adopting anti-Semitic stances, while others focus on cultural and spiritual identity.

___________________________

Note: *The choice of a jazz terminology like “syncopated” aims to reflect the complex, sometimes off-beat relationship, and “dance” to suggest the dynamic and interactive nature of the debate, while “discordant” highlights the conflict and tension between the two groups.

___________________________

Sources

A. Ehrman, « The Commandment Keepers: A Negro Jewish cult in America today », Judaism: A Quarterly Journal, No. 8, 1959, p. 266-270 ; H. Brotz, The black Jews of Harlem : Negro nationalism and the dilemmas of Negro leadership, New York, Free Press of Glencoe, 1964 ; A. Dobrin, A history of the Negro Jews in America, Mémoire non publié, City College of New York, 1965 ; R. Landes, « Negro Jews in Harlem », Jewish Journal of Sociology, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1967, p. 175-189 ; H. Waitzkin, « Black Judaism in New York », Harvard Journal of Negro Affairs, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1967, p. 12-44.

P. Chireau, N. Deutsch (éd.), Black Zion : African American religious encounters with judaism, New York, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 3.

J. S. Dorman, Chosen people : the rise of American Black Israelite religions, New York, Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 200.

R. S. Gold, « The black jews of Harlem : Representation, identity, and race, 1920-1939 », American Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2003, p. 179-225.

Lincoln County Courthouse (Chandler, Oklahoma), Miscellaneous records, Book 1, Certification of ordination of William S. Crowdy, p. 410.

D. Shapiro, « Factors in the Development of Black Judaism », in C. E. Lincold (éd.), The Black Experience in Religion, New York, Anchor Press, 1972, p. 266.

The Salt Lake herald (Salt Lake City, Utah), 27 octobre 1907, p. 4 (Chronicling America)

U.S. Department of Commerce, Religious Bodies 1936, New York, Norman Ross Publishing, 1941, p. 434, 486

  • Centres on the utility, significance, and potential impact of research and analysis
  • Encompasses a range of research attributes, including significance, utility, timeliness, actionability, practicality, applicability, feasibility, innovation, adaptability, and impact
  • Mandates that research teams clearly define the scope and objectives of their work to ensure its timeliness, feasibility, and utility
  • May necessitate adjustments to research plans -such as research questions, data sources, or methodologies- in response to new insights or evolving circumstances

    In brief, we aim to shape and advance effective, timely solutions to critical Policy challenges
  • Emphasises the pursuit of robust, replicable scientific inquiry to uncover evidence-based insights that support informed decision-making,foster stakeholder consensus, and drive effective implementation
  • Is anchored by a well-defined purpose and carefully crafted research questions.Rigorous research produces findings derived from sound, contextually appropriate methodologies, which may include established techniques, innovative approaches, or experimental designs. Conclusions and recommendations are logically derived from these findings.
  • Encompasses a range of research attributes, including validity, reliability, credibility, systematicity, creativity, persuasiveness m, logical coherence, cutting-edge innovation, authority, robustness, replicability, defensibility, and adaptability
  • Mandates that LVS researchers remain abreast of, and potentially contribute  to, advancements jn theoretical frameworks, methodologies, and data sources.

    In brief, we conduct impartial analyses rooted in a clear purpose, employing rigorous logic and the most suitable theories, methods, and data sources available
  • Emphasises the thorough, effective, and appropriate documentation and dissemination of the research process (including design, development, execution, and support) and its outcomes (findings and recommendations)
  • Encompasses key research attributes, such as accountability, comprehensive reporting, replicability, and data accessibility
  • Mandates that research teams clearly articulate and document their purpose, scope, funding sources, assumptions, methodologies, data, results, limitations, findings, and policy recommendations to the fullest extent practicable, addressing the needs of those who oversee, evaluate, utilise, replicate, or are impacted by the research.
  • May be enhanced through supplementary materials, including research land, protocols, tools, code, datasets, reports, presentations, infographics, translations and videos
  • Requires LVS documents and products to have a defined purpose, be accessible, easily discoverable, and tailored to meet the needs of their intended audiences

    In brief, we communicate our research processes, analyses, findings, and recommendations in a manner that is clear, accessible, and actionable
  • Centres in the ethical, impartial, independent, and objective execution of research
  • Enhances the validity, credibility, acceptance, and adoption of research outcomes
  • Is upheld by institutional principles, policies, procedures, and oversight mechanisms
  • Is rooted in a genuine understanding of the values and norms of pertinent stakeholders

    In brief, we undertake research with ethical integrity, mitigate conflicts of interest, and preserve independence and objectivity

Engaged Contributor

All Visionary Benefits +

  • Members-only White Papers
  • Regular Contributor in Communiqué
  • Private in-person conversation with one of our Experts
  • Guest Speaker in Podcasts / Webinars
  • Recognition as Engaged Contributor (website)

Contribution Level: $150 monthly/$1,250 annually

Important Contributor

All Strategist Benefits +

  • Members-only Position papers
  • Recognition as Important contributor in Annual Impact Report
  • Complimentary copies of new publications
  • Publication of one article in Communiqué (full page) 
Contribution Level: $60 monthly/$500 annually

Engaged Supporter

All Sentinel Benefits +

  • Members-only Position papers (BRAVE, COMPASS, STRIDE)
  • Annual Impact Report
  • Access to members-only podcasts/webinars
  • One article in Communiqué (½ page)

Contribution Level: $30 monthly/$250 annually

  • Emphasises the integration and balanced consideration of diverse, significant perspectives throughout the research process to ensure objective and equitable representation
  • Fosters awareness of the comprehensive range of scientific and policy viewpoints on multifaceted issues
  • Guarantees that these diverse perspectives are fairly addressed throughout the research process, accurately represented, and evaluated based on evidence
  • Incorporates perspectives from individuals with varied backgrounds and expertise within research teams and through collaboration with diverse reviewers, partners and stakeholders
  • Strengthens research teams’ capacity to comprehend the policy context and enhance the applicability of findings and conclusions

    In brief, we systematically integrate all relevant perspectives across the research process
  • Enhances comprehension of the problem and it’s context, while strengthening research design
  • Guides the evaluation of potential solutions and facilitates effective implementation
  • Entails incorporating diverse, relevant perspectives to promote rigorous, mitigate unintended bias in research design, execution, and dissemination, and ensure findings are pertinent and clear to key stakeholders
  • Arrives to make LVS research accessible, where feasible, to a wide array of stakeholders beyond sponsors, decision-makers, or implementers
  • Occurs across the research life cycle through formal and informal methods, including discussions, interviews, focus groups, surveys, advisory panels, presentations, and community engagements

    In brief, we actively collaborate with stakeholders vested in the conduct, interpretation, and utilisation of our research.

Entry Level

Recognition as Supporter
  • Monthly Newsletter Communiqué
  • Briefs (BRAVE, COMPASS, STRIDE)
  • Beyond Boundaries Podcast
  • Digital Membership
  • Merchandising (in process)
Contribution Level: $7 monthly/$60 annually

We offer a 4-tier program with highly exclusive Benefits. Read more about this strategic partnership.

You are invited to contribute at your discretion, and we deeply appreciate your support. Together, we can make a meaningful impact. To join us or learn more, please contact us at [email protected]

The Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation: A Legacy Reborn

June 11, 2025 – 249 years ago, on this very date, history pivoted on the axis of human possibility.

June 11, 1776. The Continental Congress, meeting in the hallowed chambers of Independence Hall, appointed five extraordinary visionaries to a committee that would forever alter the trajectory of human civilization. Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert R. Livingston—men of profound intellect and unwavering conviction—were entrusted with the sacred task of drafting the Declaration of Independence. In that momentous decision, they established not merely a political document, but a philosophical foundation upon which the principles of liberty, self-governance, and human dignity would rest for generations yet unborn.

Today, We Stand at Another Threshold

On June 11, 2025—exactly 249 years later—the Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation emerges to carry forward the luminous torch of those founding principles into the complexities of our modern age. Just as Jefferson and his fellow committee members understood that true independence required both visionary thinking and strategic action, the Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation recognizes that preserving and advancing liberty in the 21st century demands sophisticated analysis, bold leadership, and unwavering commitment to the fundamental values that define human flourishing.

A Foundation Built on Timeless Principles

The parallels between then and now are profound:

  • Then, Five visionary leaders gathered to articulate the philosophical foundations of a new nation. Now, A new foundation emerges to advance strategic thinking on liberty’s most pressing challenges
  • Then, The Committee of Five understood that ideas must be coupled with practical wisdom. Now, The Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation bridges timeless principles with contemporary strategic insight
  • Then, They recognized that liberty requires constant vigilance and thoughtful stewardship. Now, We commit to that same vigilance in an increasingly complex world

In the shadow of Ethiopia’s Omo Valley, where the Mursi people etch resilience into their skin through lip plates and the Hamar tribe’s bull-jumping rites forge indomitable courage, a new chapter in the global fight for liberty begins. The Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation (LVS Foundation) launches today as a vanguard of 21st-century research, merging scholarly rigor with actionable strategy through its revolutionary Cohesive Research Ecosystem (CORE). Founded by Dr. Fundji Benedict—a scholar whose lineage intertwines Afrikaner grit, Ethiopian sovereignty, and Jewish perseverance—this institution embodies a legacy of defiance inherited from history’s most audacious truth-seekers, from Zora Neale Hurston to the warrior women of Ethiopia. This duality—scholarship as sword and shield—mirrors Dr. Benedict’s own journey. For 10+ years, she navigated bureaucratic inertia and geopolitical minefields, her resolve hardened by the Ethiopian women warriors who once defied Italian fascism.

 

 

I. The Hurston Imperative: Truth as a Weapon

Zora Neale Hurston, the Harlem Renaissance icon who “broke through racial barriers” and declared, “Truth is a letter from courage,” is the Foundation’s spiritual lodestar. Like Hurston, who documented Black life under Jim Crow with unflinching authenticity, the LVS Foundation wields research as both shield and scalpel. BRAVE, its human rights arm, intervenes in crises with the precision Hurston brought to folklore studies, transforming marginalized voices into policy. When Somali warlords displace the Gabra people or Ethiopian officials seize tribal lands, BRAVE acts with the urgency of Hurston’s anthropological missions, ensuring that “truth-telling becomes liberation”.

Dr. Benedict’s decade-long journey mirrors Hurston’s defiance. “My ancestors did not bow. I will not bow,” she asserts, her cadence echoing the Omo Valley’s ceremonial chants. This ethos permeates the Foundation’s CORE model, where BRAVE, COMPASS, and STRIDE operate in symphonic unity. “CORE is our answer to siloed thinking,” Dr. Benedict explains. “Through this cohesive ecosystem, BRAVE, COMPASS, and STRIDE work in concert—breaking down

barriers between academic research, fieldwork, and strategic action. This enables us to develop innovative solutions and stride toward lasting change”.

 

II. Necropolitics and the Battle for Human Dignity

The Foundation’s research agenda confronts necropolitics—a term coined by Achille Mbembe to describe regimes that decide “who may live and who must die”. In Somalia, where Al-Shabaab turns villages into killing fields, and South Africa, where post-apartheid politics increasingly marginalize minorities, the LVS Foundation exposes systemic dehumanization. STRIDE, now correctly positioned as the bulwark against terrorism and antisemitism, dismantles networks fueled by Qatari financing and ideological venom. COMPASS, the geopolitical hub, maps Qatar’s $6 billion influence campaigns, revealing how Doha’s alliances with Islamist groups destabilize democracies from Sahel to Paris, France.

“Qatar hides behind diplomatic immunity while funding mass murder,” Dr. Benedict states, citing Israeli intelligence linking Qatari funds to Hamas’s October 7 massacre. Meanwhile, BRAVE echoes fieldwork in Ethiopia’s Babille Elephant Sanctuary—where Dr. Benedict has studied bee barriers to resolve human-wildlife conflict—and epitomizes the Foundation’s ethos: “We turned conflict into cooperation, just as our ancestors turned adversity into art”.

 

III. The Ethiopian Woman Warrior: A Blueprint for Ferocity

The Foundation’s DNA is steeped in the legacy of Ethiopian women who weaponized intellect and audacity. Woizero Shewareged Gedle, who orchestrated prison breaks and ammunition heist during Italy’s occupation, finds her echo in STRIDE’s Intelligence operations. She struck an Italian officer mid-interrogation and declared, “You may imprison me, but you will not insult me”. Her defiance lives in STRIDE’s intelligence operations and BRAVE’s land-rights advocacy for all minorities like the Hamar, who endure ritual whipping to cement bonds of loyalty – a fight as visceral as it is cerebral -, but also the tribes or the Afrikaners in South Africa who face expropriation of their property without compensation. Dr. Benedict’s leadership rejects the false binary between academia and activism: “Research is not abstraction—it is alchemy. We transmute data into justice”.

 

IV. Conclusion: Lighting the Torch for Generations

The Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation stands as more than an institution—it is a living testament to the unyielding spirit of those who refuse to let darkness prevail. In a world where necropolitics reduces human lives to chess pieces and terrorism metastasizes in the shadows, the Foundation’s CORE research ecosystem illuminates a different path: one where rigorous scholarship becomes the catalyst for liberation. Every report published, every policy advocated, and every community defended is a reaffirmation of democracy’s most sacred tenet—that every life holds irreducible value.

Dr. Benedict’s vision transcends academic abstraction: BRAVE’s defense of pastoralist communities, COMPASS’s geopolitical cartography, and STRIDE’s dismantling of hate networks are not isolated acts but threads in a tapestry woven with the same audacity that Zora Neale Hurston brought to anthropology and Woizero Shewareged Gedle to resistance. The Foundation’s decade-long gestation mirrors the patience of Ethiopian honey hunters who wait years for the perfect hive—a reminder that enduring change demands both urgency and perseverance.

As a beacon for liberty, the LVS Foundation invites collaboration across borders and disciplines. To governments grappling with Qatar’s influence campaigns, to activists documenting human rights abuses, to citizens weary of complacency, the Foundation offers not just data but a blueprint for courage and defiance. Its research ecosystem—dynamic, interconnected, and unapologetically action-oriented—proves that knowledge, when wielded with integrity, can dismantle even the most entrenched systems of oppression.

 

The Torch Burns Bright

Over the past decade, Dr Benedict has combined rigorous academic work with on-the-ground engagement, building the knowledge and networks required to create this institution. Now, as the Foundation opens its doors, it stands as a testament to principled scholarship and action. In the legacy of Zora Neale Hurston’s fearless truth-telling, the LVS Foundation embraces the

power of knowledge guided by values. Crucially, the LVS Foundation maintains strict independence from any partisan or governmental funding. This non-partisanship is a cornerstone of its identity. “From day one, we refuse to be anyone’s instrument – no government, no party. Our independence guarantees that our voice remains unbiased and our research uncompromised,” Dr. Benedict emphasizes. “We owe that to the truth we seek. Hurston taught us about authenticity and courage; in that spirit, we will not pander or censor ourselves. We will ask the hard questions and pursue answers – wherever they lead – in service of liberty and human dignity.”

The revolution Dr. Benedict ignited is not hers alone. It belongs to every individual who dares to believe that democracy can be defended, that integrity can be restored, and that liberty is worth every sacrifice. Zora Neale Hurston once wrote, “There are years that ask questions and years that answer.” For the LVS Foundation, this is the year of answers and a responsibility to honor Hurston’s legacy by ensuring truth is not just spoken but lived. Those seeking to support Liberty Values & Strategy Foundation—through funding, fieldwork, or amplification—are welcomed at [email protected] or [email protected].